- Before
- “If we're wrong, I want to know before the agency tells me.” Approved replies written by hand, often from a template that missed the agency's claim.
- Now
- Signs the replies and withdrawals the agents drafted overnight, each claim answered with its source, and learns first when Corvane is wrong.
One agency debit memo dispute, from the agency's claim to a signed reply
Corvane Airways, a fictional network carrier with its hub at JFK, settles US agencies through ARC and 42 markets through BSP. On Thursday, October 15, Harborline Travel Group — its third-largest agency in Boston — has disputed two memos. Here is what happens next, screen by screen, in the working solution.
- 01Thursday, 8:40 a.m.
The agents worked overnight; she starts with what needs her
Elena Park · Sales Audit LeadElena's home screen says it plainly: the memo agents audited 88,940 agency tickets sold last week and read all 46 open disputes. 38 memos hold and their replies are drafted; on 7, Corvane is wrong and they propose withdrawing. Beside the list, she talks to the agents — the Ticket auditor, the Rule checker and the Agency insights agent each report what they did, with the source behind every statement. Collected over the last 12 months: 84%, $2.84M of $3.38M.
“Nothing goes to an agency until you sign it.”
- 02One memo, two columns
Corvane's case on the left, Harborline's dispute on the right
Dispute reader · Rule checkerADM-26-04417, $412.60, on ticket 381-2400118765, JFK–LHR–JFK on fare basis QAP21N: booked Sep 3, ticket due by Sep 6, ticketed Sep 19 — 13 days late. Dana Ruiz, Harborline's ticketing manager, disputed on Oct 9. The Dispute reader split her text into three claims, quoted exactly, and the Rule checker answered each one: the 21-day reservation was made in time (partly true), the stored fare should be honored (does not hold), and the administrative fee should be waived for volume (does not hold).
Fare rule category 5: ticketing within 72 hours after reservations or at least 21 days before departure, whichever is earlier.
- 03Every value opens its source
Line 7 of the reservation history settles it
Elena Park · Sales Audit LeadShe clicks the time limit on the timeline. The reservation history opens, read-only: line 7, set by the Corvane system at booking, reads “TK TL06SEP/2359 · ticket by Sep 6 23:59 or fare lapses”; line 8 shows the stored fare expired; line 9 shows the ticket issued on Sep 19 at the expired fare, not re-priced. The agency's own screenshot stops at line 4.
The Ticket auditor and the Rule checker priced it separately and both found KAP14N, $835.60, to the cent.
- 04The draft reply
A reply that answers each claim, and a question in plain words
Reply drafterThe Reply drafter's letter walks through category 5, the time limit in line 7, the fare that applied on Sep 19 — KAP14N, a difference of $337.60 — and the $75.00 administrative fee under Corvane ADM policy §4.2, and attaches the reservation history and the fare quote. Elena asks the agents whether the stored-fare argument is valid. The Rule checker answers with the history lines and adds that under Resolution 824 the agent is responsible for ticketing under the fare's rules.
Confidence 96% · cited: fare rule category 5, reservation history lines 7–9, fare quote Sep 19, policy §4.2.
- 05Signed at 08:42
She sends it with a reason code and her signature
Elena Park · Sales Audit LeadSend reply opens the decision: the reply on ADM-26-04417 goes to Harborline Travel Group through ARC Memo Manager, and the $412.60 memo stands and goes to the next settlement. She picks the reason code “Memo holds: rule applied as filed”, can add a note for the record, and ticks “I confirm this decision”. The reply is sent and the decision is written to the audit trail.
- 06The second memo
On ADM-26-04398, the agents say Corvane is wrong
Rule checkerHarborline's other dispute makes two short claims: “This exchange was made because of Corvane's schedule change on CV 6. The change fee does not apply.” The Rule checker looked at Corvane's side first. CV 6 JFK–CDG was retimed by 2 h 10 min on Sep 22, and waiver WV-26-118 waived the change fee for a new date within ±7 days. The exchange record carries the waiver's endorsement, WV26118. But the week-39 audit ran on Sep 30, and the waiver reached the audit rules only on Oct 1. The $375.00 memo does not hold; a withdrawal note is drafted, with an apology.
“Before defending ADM-26-04398 I checked Corvane's side first, and we are wrong.”
- 07Same cause
Eleven memos at nine agencies, withdrawn together
Elena Park · Sales Audit LeadThe cause screen shows the whole mistake: 11 memos, 9 agencies, $4,125.00 billed in error, 4 disputed so far. Seven have not been disputed and would go to the ARC settlement on Tue Oct 20 unless withdrawn by Mon Oct 19, 17:00. Elena withdraws ADM-26-04398 with the reason code “Airline waiver applied”, then the other ten in one signed decision; each agency gets the Reply drafter's note. The fix — load waivers the hour they are published — goes to Pricing.
- 08The rest of the queue
Disputes grouped by what the agents found
Tom Brennan · Sales Audit AnalystThe other disputes are grouped by verdict: memo holds, reply drafted; Corvane is wrong, withdrawal proposed — two duplicates and Corvane's own fare filing that missed the stay rule among them; and agents disagree. “Select all I can send” picks only the replies within the signer's limit — $500 for Tom — and asks for one signature. Four replies are due by Sun Oct 18, all drafted.
- 09Agents disagree
Two readings, no reply drafted — a person decides
Ticket auditor · Rule checkerOn ADM-26-04431, Skyhaven Journeys says its Classic fare includes one free date change. The Ticket auditor reads filed category 31 as governing: $1,186.20 stands (72% confident). The Rule checker reads the fare family the agency sold and the passenger was shown: the first change is free, $886.20 (64%). The two filings conflict, so no reply is drafted. Elena can defend, reduce or withdraw, and Pricing gets the conflict to fix.
“The Ticket auditor and I read the filings differently, so I did not draft a reply.”
- 10The pattern
Harborline gets a call and a note, not just another memo
Agency insights agent · Luis MorenoFive of Harborline's six advance-purchase memos came after its Aug 14 booking-tool switch, each ticketed 4 to 13 days after the time limit; two more are drafted this week. Harborline runs 4.4 memos per 1,000 tickets against Corvane's 1.3. The agent drafted an education note to Dana Ruiz for Luis Moreno, Agency Relations Manager, who decides what is sent — and can switch on “Talk first before new memos” so Harborline's drafts wait for him.
Relationship note, Aug 20: “I agreed to review their memos monthly with them. No fee waiver agreed.”