Solution
For FP&A, investor relations, and research teams covering earnings: a cited first draft of commentary, in your house structure, minutes after results land.
The problem
Results land and analysts spend the night restating tables in prose — revenue up this much, margin down that much — before anyone gets to what it means.
With no way to see where a number came from, reviewers re-derive each figure by hand. One transposed digit in investor material is a bad week.
Each analyst writes from a blank page, so the same movement gets different words, different emphasis, and different KPI definitions across entities and quarters.
The product, not a promise
How it works
Earnings releases, statements, and KPI baskets load as soon as results are available.
Agents calculate period-over-period movements and compare actuals against guidance and consensus inputs you provide.
The platform writes first-pass commentary — what changed, by how much, and where the number lives.
Every figure in the draft links to the statement line or release paragraph it came from.
An analyst edits, signs off, and releases the commentary to its destination.
Who it's for
FP&A / IR analyst
Head of FP&A / IR
Controller / compliance
Earnings commentary is skilled work built on unskilled hours. Analysts spend the crunch nights of every reporting cycle restating tables in prose: revenue moved this much, margin compressed that much, three segments beat and one missed. The judgment is in the framing; the hours go to the mechanics.
Botminds takes the mechanics. Feed it the earnings release, the financial statements, and the KPI basket you track, and agents compute the movements — quarter over quarter, year over year, actual versus guidance — and draft the commentary around them. Drafts follow your house structure and terminology because they are built from your prior commentary and your KPI definitions rather than a generic template.
Each number in the draft is cited to the statement line or release paragraph it came from: click the figure, see the source. Reviewers verify the claims that matter and skip the archaeology. The result is a first draft in minutes — analysts start from a near-complete draft and spend their time on what the numbers mean.
No draft self-publishes. Commentary moves through an approval flow: agents write, an analyst reviews and edits, a named person signs off, and the platform records who approved what and when. That trail matters when commentary feeds investor materials, credit reviews, or anything a regulator might later ask about.
The pattern holds at any scale. Whether you run one entity’s earnings or commentary across an entire coverage list, the same pipeline applies the same movement math, the same house structure, and the same evidence standard, every cycle — so quality stops depending on which analyst drew the crunch-night shift.
Objections, answered
Every figure is cited to the statement line or release paragraph it came from — reviewers click the number and see the source. Anything the platform is less sure about is flagged rather than smoothed over, and a named analyst approves the draft before it goes anywhere.
Drafts are built from your prior commentary, your section structure, and your KPI definitions, so the terminology and framing are yours. The first cycle calibrates it against commentary you actually published; after that the draft reads like your team wrote it.
Results and drafts stay in your governed workspace under your access controls. The platform records the source, the computation, the edits, and the approver for every draft, so audit reviews a trail instead of reconstructing one.
Days, not a quarter. Load a prior release and your KPI basket, compare the draft against the commentary you published, and calibrate — then run live on the next reporting cycle.
Watch a cited first draft of your commentary come together live in the demo.
Request a demo