- Before
- Makes discipline decisions at 10 AM and meets a parent at 11, with no lawyer down the hall and a callback promised for tomorrow.
- Now
- Asks in plain words and gets the deadline as a date, with the federal, state and district sentences quoted beneath it and the next step one click away.
One manifestation review, from the IDEA regulations to the special education procedures manual
Tuesday, October 20, 2026, at Marlow Bay Unified School District. A student with an IEP is suspended for a tenth day this school year, and the principal needs the deadline before her next meeting. The answer comes from three layers of rules, counted on the district's calendar, and on the way it finds that the special education procedures manual cites a rule that has moved.
- 0110:14 AM
A plain question, typed once
Renata Okafor · Principal, Linden Park Middle SchoolRenata types her question into the one box on the home screen: a 7th grader with an IEP was suspended today for a tenth day this school year, so how long does the district have to hold the manifestation determination review? Under the box, a line shows when each source was last updated: federal current through October 16, the state amended June 1, the manual at version 2025.2.
“I need the date, not a chapter to read.”
- 02Before logging
The student's name never reaches the log
Privacy agentBefore the question is logged or passed to any other agent, the Privacy agent removes the student's name. The question is kept as “[student name removed] (7th grade, IEP) was suspended today for a tenth day this school year.” A chip on the answer says one student name was removed before logging.
- 038 seconds
Three layers stacked, the one to follow named
Retrieval and Strictness agentsThe Retrieval agent finds the governing sentence in each layer. Federal, 34 CFR 300.530(e)(1): 10 school days. State Rule 5-207(b): 10 school days. The district manual, §7.4, p. 42: 7 school days. The Strictness agent marks the manual “Follow this · stricter”, because a district may be stricter here. Confidence is 0.96, above the district's 0.85 threshold, so the answer is shown without the coordinator.
“Hold the manifestation determination review within 7 school days: by Friday, October 30, 2026.”
- 04Same answer
The deadline as a date on the district's calendar
Calendar agentThe Calendar agent counts school days on the 2026–27 calendar from the student information system. Friday, October 23 is a staff development day with no school, so it is skipped: day 7 is Friday, October 30, and the federal and state deadline is Wednesday, November 4. Under the ruler, what is also due: notify the parents and give them the procedural safeguards notice today (34 CFR 300.530(h)), and services continue from the 11th day of removal.
- 05One click
The page behind the citation
Renata Okafor · PrincipalRenata clicks the manual citation. Page 42 of the 2025–26 procedures manual opens with §7.4.1 highlighted: the case manager schedules the review to be held within seven school days. The page shows its version, 2025.2 of August 4, 2025, approved by Dr. Elaine Kessler, and a notice that it cites a state rule that has since been renumbered.
- 06One more click
The state rule, in the version in force
Retrieval agentThe state layer opens at Rule 5-207(b): the review shall be held within ten school days of the decision to change the student's placement. The version history shows why the manual is wrong: the rule was 4-310(c) until the state's July 1, 2024 renumbering, and the June 1, 2026 amendment changed the initial evaluation timeline.
- 0710:14 AM
A correction filed while answering
Currency agentThe Currency agent saw that §7.4 still cites State Rule 4-310(c), so it filed correction C-0117 to the coordinator: “(see State Rule 4-310(c))” struck through, “(see State Rule 5-207(b))” inserted. It is one of 14 open corrections; 10 more citation-only renumberings from the same amendment can be checked in one step.
The Currency agent never edits the manual itself. It files a redline for a person.
- 08Checked, then published
Two people, two steps
Gwen Hollister · Special Education Compliance CoordinatorGwen checks the redline. Dr. Elaine Kessler, Executive Director of Special Education, publishes it as errata E-10 to manual version 2025.2. Neither can do the other's step, and both are recorded. Open corrections fall to 13, and answers now cite the new text.
- 09Confidence 0.62
A question with no clear answer goes to a person
Gwen Hollister · Special Education Compliance CoordinatorKendra Mills, assistant principal at Seacliff High School, asks whether a student with a Section 504 plan only, at nine days of removal, is owed a manifestation review, and whether the in-school suspension room counts. The manual and the state rules are silent, so Q-18377 goes to Gwen's queue with why it was routed, the passages found and a 2-school-day clock. Two questions past the clock are already escalated to Dr. Kessler.
- 102:05 PM
Answered once, approved by counsel
Philip Arendt · District counselGwen drafts district interpretation DI-2026-039, citing 34 CFR 104.35(a), 34 CFR 300.536(a), the IDEA analysis of comments and Manual §7.4, effective October 21, 2026 and due for review by October 21, 2027. Philip approves it with reason DI-A2, and it becomes a fourth, cited layer in every later answer. Gwen, the drafter, cannot approve it.
DI-A2: “Approve · stricter than required, a district choice.”