- Before
- Reads the order, then spends weeks of email finding what it touches. “Knowing the rule changed is easy. Knowing what it breaks takes me three weeks.”
- Now
- Opens the redline with the impact graph beside it, clicks a clause to see its procedures, systems and owners, reviews and signs the map.
One rule change, from the docket to owned, dated work
On Oct 9, 2026 the Calder Public Service Commission adopted Order 26-0412 in rulemaking docket R-26-0147, rewriting Rule 20-6-412, Disconnection of residential service. The order was issued Oct 12 and takes effect Jan 15, 2027. Lumina Utilities serves electric and water customers in the territory. It is Tuesday Oct 13, with 94 days to go. Here is what happens, screen by screen, in the working solution.
- 0105:30
41 new filings read, one scored 97
Docket watcher and Relevance rankerThe Docket watcher reads 63 sources: commission dockets and orders, the Calder Register, the legislature, federal notices and 18 peer utility filings. The Relevance ranker scores Order 26-0412 at 97 — electric and water, residential, Lumina on the service list, and 6 obligations in the register cite the rule. Seven items clear the alert threshold; a gas pipeline odorant rule scores 12 and is kept, with its reason.
Kept for the record: “Lumina has no gas service” — every low score keeps its reason.
- 0205:36 – 05:46
The order redlined, and the work it touches drawn beside it
Redline builder, Impact mapper, Effort estimatorThe Redline builder compares the 14-page order with the 2019 text clause by clause: 6 clauses changed, 4 amended and 2 new, every word quoted. The Impact mapper links them to 6 obligations, 9 procedures, 5 system changes, 3 policies and 7 owners, with confidence of 89–97 %. The Effort estimator puts the work at 548 hours, done Jan 6 with 9 days to spare.
“Plan writer drafted 19 tasks and 7 summaries — waiting for Elena. Nothing is sent until the impact map is signed.”
- 03Morning
She clicks the notice clause, and its paths light up
Elena Varga · Regulatory compliance managerClause (3)(a) moves written notice from ten to twenty calendar days before disconnection, and adds text or email where the customer chose it. In the graph, 4 procedures light up — the collections notice run, disconnect scheduling, payment arrangement offers and the disconnection notice letters — with 2 system changes, policy CC-04 and 4 owners: Ruth Adeyemi, Hana Sato, Diego Ramos and Tom Kessler.
“…at least twenty (20) calendar days before the date of disconnection, by first-class mail and, where the customer has chosen to receive notices by text message or email, by that means as well.”
- 04The effort
186 hours, and the two tasks that must beat the freeze
Effort estimatorThe effort card lists seven tasks for the clause, 186 hours over 9 weeks, finishing Dec 15. Two are billing-system work for Tom Kessler: moving the final-notice trigger from day 10 to day 20 (60 h, Dec 10) and sending disconnect notices by text and email (46 h, Dec 15). Both are flagged as system work that must land before the Dec 18 change freeze.
“Billing changes must be live before the Dec 18 freeze: the day-20 trigger ends Dec 10 and text and email notices Dec 15, three days before it.”
- 05A peer check
What a neighbouring utility filed for the same order
Elena Varga · Regulatory compliance managerNorthvale Power & Light filed its compliance plan for Order 26-0412 on Oct 12. It moves the final notice to day 24 after the bill so the 20 days end on a business day, sends text notices only to customers who opt in before Dec 1, and asks for 60 days' grace on the first ZIP-code report. Elena compares it with Lumina's plan, which files a test report by Jan 6.
- 06The register
Six obligations marked “Changes Jan 15”
Impact mapperIn the obligations register, the six affected rows carry the new text, the owner and the control that proves it: OB-412-01, at least 20 days' written notice, owned by Ruth Adeyemi and checked by a monthly sample of 50 notices; OB-412-03, no disconnection in forecast cold of 32 °F or below or a 95 °F heat advisory, owned by Hana Sato with a daily weather hold report. The rest of the register stays in force.
- 07The plan
19 tasks laid out against the freeze and the effective date
Plan writer and Effort estimatorThe implementation plan runs from today to Jan 15: 19 tasks, 548 hours, 7 owners, grouped by clause, with the Dec 18 – Jan 4 change freeze and the effective date drawn across the timeline. Each owner's hours are set against what they have free to Jan 6; Hana Sato and Nikhil Rao are at 80 % and Tom Kessler at 76 %, above the 75 % warning line.
- 08One request
A retraining task added, and the plan still fits
Elena Varga · Regulatory compliance managerElena asks the assistant to add a task: retrain care agents on the new notice script. It lands under clause (3)(c) for Amara Okoye, 16 hours, Dec 7 – Dec 22, after the CS-14 script update. The plan now has 20 tasks and 564 hours and still finishes Jan 6, with 9 days to spare.
“Retrain care agents on the new notice script · Amara · Dec 22 · 16 h”
- 09Review and sign
She signs the impact map, with the meaning of her signature
Elena Varga · Regulatory compliance managerThe approval screen shows the 6 clauses, 20 tasks to 7 owners, the plan done Jan 6, and 6 obligations updated effective Jan 15, 2027. System work comes to 250 hours, over the 200-hour line, so Marcus Bell is asked to co-sign. Elena signs with her password and the meaning “I confirm this impact map is complete and assign the tasks”.
Agents read, rank, redline, map, estimate and draft — they never sign or send.
- 10Signed · Oct 13
Seven summaries reach seven teams
Plan writerThe Plan writer sends 20 tasks to 7 owners and one summary to each business unit, every line citing its clause: Credit and Collections, Field Operations, Billing Systems, Customer Communications, Customer Care, Water Customer Services and Regulatory Reporting. Billing Systems has already acknowledged. The register is updated, and Marcus Bell gets a one-page board summary.
“Signed — 20 tasks sent to 7 owners · Marcus Bell asked to co-sign”