- Before
- Re-keys a sample of statements against the contract and researches each crew question in three systems.
- Now
- Starts with every statement recomputed and 1,092 corrections grouped by cause. “Show me the leg and the clause, not just a number.”
One crew pay audit, from the overnight run to a signed correction
Corvane Airways, a fictional network carrier of about 300 aircraft and 17,280 crew, calculated its October settlement on Mon 2 Nov. Payday is Fri 13 Nov; corrections close Mon 9 Nov, 17:00. Here is Wednesday morning, screen by screen, in the working solution.
- 01Wednesday, 08:40
The whole month audited before she logs in
Megan Albright · Crew Payroll AnalystOvernight the pay agents recomputed all 17,280 October statements. Her home screen shows 764 crew paid too little ($184,834.27), 328 paid too much ($113,300.36) and 1,092 corrections waiting for a decision. Beside it the agents report in plain words: the checker traced the differences to 8 causes and held 3 disagreements for her, and the crew answer agent drafted 7 replies to crew pay questions. She can ask them anything from the same box — “Why was Camille Rhodes underpaid?”
“FA Camille Rhodes was underpaid $212.40 for October … The same cause touches 152 attendants.”
- 02One click
Camille's statement, recomputed line by line
Pay calculator · CheckerCamille Rhodes, a JFK purser in her 17th year, flew four pairings in October, two of them to Tokyo: J4127 and J4180. The month strip marks both, and a note says they were reissued on Oct 2. Every pay line shows how it is computed, what the statement paid, what the agents recomputed and the contract section behind it. One line differs: international premium, $0.00 against $212.40. The total moves from $8,130.18 to $8,342.58.
Checker: “I recomputed it on my own from the aircraft data link: agree to the cent.”
- 03The evidence
The working, the clause and the sources behind one line
Megan Albright · Crew Payroll AnalystMegan clicks the line. The working reads 59:00 credited × $3.60. The clause is FA Agreement §5.F.2 as amended by LOA 26-03, which raised the premium from $3.25 on Oct 1, with the rate highlighted. The sources read are listed: the pay feed records for J4127 and J4180, the data link for CV 96 and her October statement.
“The statement shows no premium: both pairings were reissued on Oct 2 and arrived in the pay feed without their international flag.”
- 04She asks
“Why wasn't her per diem affected too?”
CheckerMegan asks the agents in the statement's own conversation. The checker answers with its source: per diem comes from the crew expense system, which reads the layover station rather than the pairing's flag. Both Tokyo pairings were paid at the international rate, $3.10 an hour for 153:20 — $475.33, correct to the cent.
- 05Signed
She approves with a reason and her signature
Megan Albright · Crew Payroll AnalystCorrection C-1001, +$212.40, earning code INTL-PREM, pays on the Fri 13 Nov settlement. Megan picks the reason “Feed or table error corrected”, ticks “I confirm this decision” and signs. The correction is approved, and the decision goes on the audit trail with her name and the time.
The agents draft; only Crew Payroll approves a change to pay.
- 06One cause, 152 crew
Fix the pattern, not just the person
Checker · Ray Tolliver, Crew SchedulerThe cause page lists everyone the reissued pairings touched: 152 flight attendants, +$22,902.60, no paid month affected. Megan can approve every ready correction in one signature. The fix — carry the international flag when crew scheduling reissues a pairing — goes to its owner, Ray Tolliver, and the agents re-check the pattern every night until he accepts it.
“Crew Scheduler decides; the agents watch for the pattern every night until then.”
- 07Camille's question
The reply comes from the same evidence
Crew answer agentCamille asked about her two Tokyo trips on Mon 2 Nov (Q-3318). The crew answer agent drafted the reply with the clause, the pay feed record and her statement attached. It could not be sent until C-1001 was approved; now it can, and a person sends it through the crew portal.
“Hi Camille — you are right … The correction is on your November 13 settlement.”
- 08The union's grievance
41 named, 152 found
Grievance evidence agent · Denise WhitakerThe flight attendants' union filed G-26-114 on Tue 3 Nov for 41 named attendants. Denise Whitaker, Labor Relations Manager, asks the grievance evidence agent why it found more. It matched the grievance to the cause, not the names, and recomputing every attendant found 152. Its proposed position: settle by paying every affected crew member through the October corrections and share the calculation. Denise decides.
“Settling through the corrections pays all of them on the Fri 13 Nov settlement, so no second grievance follows.”
- 09Where the agents disagree
A pilot pay discrepancy: two block-in times, held for a person
CheckerFor First Officer Hannah Kessler, crew tracking says CV 119 blocked in at 23:58 on Oct 24; the aircraft data link and the gate system say 23:12. The pay calculator drafted +$248.88 for a reassignment override; the checker disagrees and puts it at +$164.70. Approve is blocked: Megan edits the amount or rejects it.
“Two of three sources agree on 23:12. I have held this for a person.”
- 10Already paid
A recovery inside the notice period and the cap
Correction drafter · Curtis VaughnCaptain Russell Haynes was paid both trip protection and his replacement flying in September: $3,974.40 overpaid. Because it was already paid, the correction drafter plans four deductions of $993.60 — 10% of his $9,936.00 average net — starting Tue 15 Dec, and drafts the notice with the calculation. Curtis Vaughn approves the plan; Labor Relations signs the notice.
“30 days’ written notice with the calculation, and no more than 10% of net pay per period.”