Solution

eDiscovery Evidence Engine

For litigation teams, in-house counsel, and legal operations: a defensibly culled, relevance-ranked review population from terabytes of email, chat, and file data.

Emails & PSTsChat logsMobile backupsCase documentsCloud collaboration exports
Chain of custody preserved from collection to productionPrivilege screened before anything is producedEvery production decision made by the legal team

The problem

Why this exists

Terabytes

Volume outran linear review

Email archives, Slack and Teams exports, mobile backups — reading it all linearly stopped fitting inside any real deadline or budget years ago.

Fatigue

Humans at volume miss context

Large review teams grinding through mundane documents miss the thread that matters. Fatigue is a property of people at scale, however careful.

One waiver

Privilege slips are permanent

A privileged communication that leaves in a production cannot be unproduced. Screening with tired eyes is a bet you eventually lose.

The product, not a promise

A collection you can interrogate

eDiscovery Evidence Engine — workspace
Population after cullingDuplicates removed, threads collapsedcited
Key actors & topicsVisible within hours of collectioncited
Relevance queueRanked, likeliest-to-matter firstcited
Custody logEvery file, collection to productioncited
Potentially privileged thread — walled off for second-tier reviewverify
HUMAN-APPROVED BEFORE IT POSTS

How it works

File in. Answer out.

  1. 1

    Collect

    PSTs, chat exports, mobile backups, and cloud collaboration data ingest with custody preserved.

  2. 2

    Cull

    Deduplication, email threading, and near-duplicate detection shrink the review population immediately.

  3. 3

    Rank

    Concept clustering and relevance ranking put the documents most likely to matter in front of reviewers first.

  4. 4

    Screen

    Potentially privileged communications are flagged and segregated for focused second-tier review.

  5. 5

    Produce

    Productions ship with automated reports documenting culling criteria and search methodology.

Who it's for

Built for the people who own the outcome

Review attorney

Read what matters first.

  • Threads collapsed so each conversation is read once
  • A relevance-ranked queue instead of an alphabetical grind
  • Privileged material walled off before it can slip

Litigation partner

Case posture visible in hours, not weeks.

  • Key actors and dominant topics surface right after collection
  • Early assessment informs settlement posture while options are open
  • Multi-terabyte matters run without a review-team surge

Legal ops & IT

Built to be examined by opposing counsel.

  • Chain of custody traceable, collection to production
  • Culling criteria and methodology documented automatically
  • Production decisions stay with the legal team
Law firmsCorporate legalClass actionsRegulatory inquiriesInternal investigationsInsurance defense
TARtechnology-assisted review built in
Privilegescreened before anything is produced
Defensiblechain of custody on every file
Human-approvedevery production decision

Modern matters arrive as terabytes: email archives, Slack and Teams exports, mobile backups, cloud drives. Reading it all linearly stopped fitting inside any real deadline or budget years ago, and large review teams grinding through mundane documents miss context anyway — fatigue is a property of humans at volume. The working alternatives are defensible automation or sampling luck.

Cull first, then find the story

The engine ingests the full collection while preserving chain of custody for every file. Culling starts immediately: exact duplicates removed, email threads collapsed so each conversation is read once, near-duplicates grouped, conceptually similar documents clustered. The reviewable population shrinks drastically before a single attorney hour is spent, and password-protected or corrupt files are segregated for technical handling instead of silently vanishing from the record.

Early case assessment stops being a weeks-long dig. Communication patterns, key actors, and dominant topics are visible within hours of collection — enough to judge case viability and settlement posture while options are still open. Relevance ranking puts the documents most likely to matter at the front of the review queue, and potentially privileged attorney-client communications are flagged and walled off for focused second-tier review: the difference between a privilege log and a privilege waiver.

Defensibility is the product

Everything the engine does is designed to be examined by opposing counsel. Culling criteria, search methodology, and ranking decisions are captured in automated audit reports; custody is traceable from collection to production; and production decisions remain with the legal team — the engine narrows, ranks, and documents, and humans decide what leaves the building. Multi-terabyte class actions and regulatory inquiries run on the same machinery as routine matters, without the review-team surge.

Objections, answered

What teams ask us first

Will the methodology survive a challenge?

It is built to be examined: culling criteria, search methodology, and ranking decisions are captured in automated audit reports, and custody is traceable for every file from collection to production. The record answers before opposing counsel asks.

Can it follow our review protocol and the ESI order?

Yes. Culling rules, privilege screens, review tiers, and production formats are configured per matter to the governing protocol — the engine enforces the agreed methodology instead of improvising one.

What actually protects privilege?

Potentially privileged attorney-client communications are flagged and segregated before anything approaches production, then pass through focused second-tier human review. Nothing leaves without the legal team's sign-off.

A matter just landed. How fast can review start?

Collections ingest as delivered — PSTs, chat exports, mobile backups, cloud drives. Culling runs immediately, the early-case view is available within hours, and the review queue opens ranked from day one.

Bring your ugliest collection.

Watch a raw email-and-chat collection get culled, clustered, and ranked into a defensible review queue, live.

Request a demo