Solution

KYC Compliance Accelerator

For KYC analysts, MLROs, and financial-crime compliance teams at banks, fintechs, and payment firms: onboarding diligence, screening, and perpetual KYC run as one governed, logged pipeline.

ID documentsRegistry extractsOwnership chartsWatchlist resultsAdverse media
UBO ownership resolved, with sources100% of adjudications logged for auditEvery risk call human-approved

The problem

Why this exists

Weeks

UBO diligence drags onboarding

Layered corporate structures mean chasing registry documents across jurisdictions while the customer waits — and sometimes walks.

Floods

Screening buries analysts

Watchlist tools alert on every common name. The team spends its days clearing 'John Smith' hits instead of investigating actual financial-crime risk.

3 years

Re-KYC runs on a calendar

A material change in ownership or adverse media can sit unnoticed until the scheduled review date finally comes around.

The product, not a promise

A risk file with the evidence attached

KYC Compliance Accelerator — workspace
Ownership graph — resolved to the UBOEvery node backed by a sourcecited
Watchlist hit — common name, DOB mismatchDiscounted · rationale loggedcited
Sanctions match — identifiers alignRouted to analyst with evidenceverify
Registry extract — cross-referencedVerifiedcited
Adverse media — material change detectedReview triggeredcited
HUMAN-APPROVED BEFORE IT POSTS

How it works

File in. Answer out.

  1. 1

    Collect

    Ingest identity documents, registry extracts and corporate structure evidence from onboarding channels.

  2. 2

    Verify

    Validate documents and cross-reference identity data against registries and biometric checks.

  3. 3

    Screen

    Run watchlist, sanctions and adverse-media screening with fuzzy-match resolution on names and identifiers.

  4. 4

    Adjudicate

    Discount false positives on secondary identifiers; route true potential matches to an analyst with evidence attached.

  5. 5

    Monitor

    Move to perpetual KYC — trigger reviews on material changes in a customer's profile, not calendar dates.

Who it's for

Built for the people who own the outcome

KYC analyst

You investigate real matches; the noise clears itself.

  • False positives discounted on DOB, location, and other secondary identifiers
  • Each routed match arrives with its evidence already assembled
  • Ownership graphs come pre-built, every node sourced

Head of financial crime / MLRO

Onboarding speeds up while the control tightens.

  • UBO resolution runs in the pipeline instead of a weeks-long chase
  • Perpetual KYC reacts to material change, and stays quiet otherwise
  • Remediation lookbacks run at scale, without temporary hiring

Internal audit & IT

The compliance record reconstructs itself on demand.

  • Every screening decision and discounted alert logged with its evidence
  • A named human approves every risk decision
  • Deploys in private cloud or on-premises, ISO 27001 and SOC 2 certified
Retail bankingCommercial bankingFintechPaymentsWealth managementInsurance
UBOownership resolved, with sources
Fewerfalse positives reaching analysts
100%adjudications logged for audit
Every risk callhuman-approved

Onboarding diligence as a governed pipeline

KYC breaks in two directions at once. Onboarding is too slow: unraveling ultimate beneficial owners in a layered corporate structure means chasing registry documents across jurisdictions for weeks. Screening is too noisy: watchlist tools flood analysts with alerts on common names, so the team spends its days clearing false positives instead of investigating actual financial-crime risk.

The KYC Compliance Accelerator runs that workload end to end. Agents ingest identity documents and registry extracts, validate them against registries and biometric checks, and navigate corporate ownership trees to identify UBOs — producing a visual ownership graph with every node backed by a source document. Screening runs with fuzzy-match resolution: obvious false positives are discounted on secondary identifiers like date of birth and location, so analysts see the matches that deserve investigation, each arriving with its evidence already assembled.

Calendar-based re-KYC means a high-risk change can sit unnoticed until the scheduled three-year review. Because the platform maintains a single, current risk profile per customer, it triggers review when something material actually changes — new ownership, new adverse media, a jurisdiction shift — and stays quiet otherwise. The same machinery handles remediation lookbacks at scale, without hiring a temporary army.

Why governed matters here

Financial-crime compliance is judged on its record. Every screening decision, discounted alert, and analyst adjudication in Botminds is logged with the evidence it was based on, and no risk decision is taken without a named human approving it. When the regulator asks why a match was cleared in March, the answer is the complete adjudication trail — the identifiers compared, the rationale, the approver — produced in minutes, months or years later.

Objections, answered

What teams ask us first

Can I trust automated discounting of screening hits?

Every discounted alert records the identifiers it was cleared on — date of birth, location, secondary identifiers — and the rationale, in the audit log. Matches that survive discounting route to an analyst with evidence attached, and a named human makes every risk decision.

Our risk appetite and screening thresholds are our own.

They stay yours. Screening lists, match thresholds, discounting rules, and escalation paths are configured to your financial-crime policy, and applied identically on every customer — which is exactly what a regulator wants to see.

What does the regulator get when they ask about a cleared match?

The complete adjudication trail: the identifiers compared, the evidence reviewed, the rationale, the approver, the timestamp. The answer to 'why was this cleared in March' is a record, produced in minutes.

How long to deploy, and can it handle a remediation lookback?

The pipeline connects to your onboarding channels and screening sources, with your policy configured in rather than coded. The same machinery then runs lookbacks at scale — the backlog processes through the identical governed, logged flow.

Bring your most layered corporate structure.

Watch the ownership graph resolve to the UBO with a source behind every node — then see a screening queue with the noise already cleared.

Request a demo